Agentic AI Is Stress Testing Identity and Access Management”
“Last week I had a great discussion about agentic AI, and we were really just scratching the surface. I wanted to continue that conversation here because it is necessary as companies continue to move fast with the tech.”
“Traditional identity and access management (IAM) was built around people and service accounts. Many organizations are still working to manage both well today.”
“Agentic AI changes the equation.”
“When AI agents can initiate actions, make decisions, and access systems dynamically, identity is no longer static. Privileges may need to expand, contract, or shift in real time based on context.”
“That creates pressure in several places:”
“• Ownership. Who is accountable for an agent’s actions?”
“• Scope. How much access is enough without being excessive?”
“• Lifecycle. When does an agent get created, modified, or retired?”
“• Monitoring. How do we detect misuse when behavior is autonomous but expected?”
“If we treat agentic AI like just another service account, we will miss the shift.”
“Identity and access management was designed for users. Agents blur the line between user and software.”
“How are you thinking about identity and access management evolving as AI agents become more autonomous? Share your perspective in the comments.”
“If you are a founder building in this space, feel free to book time through my profile. I would welcome the conversation.”
“#AI #Cybersecurity #IAM